hey guys, i downloaded the max/msp runtime package and am trying to install it on my old g3 iBook. it gets most of the way through the installation and then quits, telling me there were errors and to try installtion again. i've tried rebooting and installing a few times but the same error comes up every time. i have: 500 mhz g3 640 megs of ram 2.5 gigs free drive space os x 10.3.9 max/msp runtime 4.6.3 any ideas? thanks! `greg
on 20.07.2007 15:54
on 20.07.2007 17:06
do you have enough disk space? are you installing to the default location?
on 20.07.2007 17:22
i'd suggest posting this error on cycling74's forum. never tried such a new version on a g3.
on 21.07.2007 21:35
i have two and a half gigs free on my disk. i'm assuming that should be enough considering the installer is 10 megs. yes, installing to the default location. i posted on cycling74's forum as well. no response yet. again, any help would be greatly appreciated. on the other hand i might just have to chalk this up as another reason to /finally/ upgrade to that macbook i've had my eye on. may as well get an iphone too while i'm at it... i digress, `greg
on 22.07.2007 09:44
i have no suggestions other than you're going to be much happier with os x 10.4 because monomeserial probably won't work with 10.3.9 sorry for the bad news.
on 23.07.2007 00:00
running 10.4 on a g3 is really really sluggish though. maybe not too bad with 640 ram, but there was an old g3 tower at this place i worked a couple of summers ago that had 10.4 on it, and it was dismal for even browsing the internet.
on 23.07.2007 23:49
fwiw, i cant get monomeserial to work on my wife's emac G4 running 10.3.9.
on 24.07.2007 14:08
the guys at cycling74 got back to me yesterday with plenty of advice on installing max/msp on my system. ...but you're right. monomeserial doesn't seem to load on 10.3.9. shoot.
on 24.07.2007 14:36
i think joe used some 10.4 specific API's or something. its kind of wierd that it doesnt give any errors, though (at least on my wifes machine). this is always an issue in software developing it seems, balancing between backwards compatibility and utilizing newer and better features. i have to say that this is one thing that MS seem to spend alot of time on, making sure that old apps dont break in new versions. and, while they often do succeed, it leads to other problems where newer parts arnt as elegant as they should be.